NS: Businessman battles town over signage
By Staff, Transcontinental Media
Source: The Amherst Daily News, Jan. 4, 2010
[AMHERST, NS] — The town of Amherst has decided it is not going to allow a local businessman to cover the front of his property with advertising signage.
Warren Chapman had requested an amendment to the town’s land-use bylaw that would have allowed him to cover the face of his building at 8 Croft Street (the former bridge workshop) with advertising.
The planning advisory committee considered the request, but recommended the town not give first reading to a bylaw amendment.
In his report to the planning advisory committee, planner Andrew Fisher said: “The land-use bylaw sign provisions are a balance between allowing businesses to effectively advertise the location of their operation, and maintaining a level of aesthetic control in the community.”
When he appeared before the committee, Chapman said the bylaw is not fair and is not being enforced evenly throughout the town. He also said it’s in contravention of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms while pointing out his signs help many small businesses advertise at an affordable price.
The present bylaw says frontal wall signs shall not cover more than 0.6 square metres for every linear metre on the wall on which the sign is affixed. The wall in question is about 81⁄2 metres wide, allowing for five square metres of sign coverage.
Fisher suggested in his report that if the town allowed Chapman to cover the front of his business with signs, all commercial buildings in the town should be permitted to do the same.
Considering the town is spending $150,000 on an arts, culture and heritage strategy, downtown redevelopment and beautification, he feels allowing this would undermine efforts to improve the town aesthetically or economically.
Related News
- View all news related to Nova Scotia
- View all news related to the following key words: advertising signage, Amherst, commercial buildings, planning advisory committee, signage laws, Warren Chapman
Today's News
- NS: Flight school loan headed for receivership
- NS: Union push led to firing, says Sears employee
- NS: Sydney riding wave of cruise ship influx
- NS: WCB reveals 2011 assessment rates
- NB: Moncton sign bylaw still in hot seat
- PE: Tourism industry experiences solid July
- NL: Labrador West clamoring for skilled workers
- NewsMakers
- Events & Announcements
- NS: Marine Atlantic overhauls controversial booking system
- NS: Province pledges funds for harbour dredging plan
- NS: CUPE fights to protect Ship Hector staff jobs
- NB: Campaigning parties vow to resolve chicken war
- PE: Novartis expansion could be on horizon
- NL: Newfoundland out of loop on CRTC rebates













Comments:
Well it looks like Amherst is finally going to “Man Up” and take a stand on signage! You’re only about 30 years behind. I’m sure Croft Street would add to “ugly” signage in Amherst…Hoever those portable signs look like they fell from the top of the ugly tree and hit every branch on the way down!…some bi laws need to be put in place to get them off the lawns of your war time homes…it’s nothing short of bad taste. It seems like Amherst is the last town to allow these signs…it’s not long ago I could buy these portable signs for $20.00 each…about two dollars more than the scrap metal value!
So wake up Amherst and change your slogan from pride in our people to include pride in our property!
I’m sure their will be a couple of people pissed at this comment…probably the sign owners