NS: Budget decisions could do long-term harm, says Corbett

By Paul McLeod, Metro Halifax

Source: Metro Halifax, March 5, 2010

[HALIFAX, NS] — Thursday’s “stand pat” federal budget likely won’t change life much for Nova Scotians this year, Deputy Premier Frank Corbett said Thursday night.

But future cuts to military spending and a freeze on public service programs could hurt the province long-term, he added.

The big bullet Nova Scotia and other provinces dodged was the Harper government not cutting transfer payments to provinces.

“It’s not any big shock what was in the budget,” Corbett told reporters. “There’s no tax increases, no big cuts to expenditures here in Nova Scotia or in Atlantic Canada. In the world we live in today, that’s a good thing.”

But he warned future plans to cut billions from the military will disproportionately affect Nova Scotia.

“We know there’s going to be some kind of impact. How big or how small an impact is fairly difficult to gauge,” he said.

Deputy Premier Frank Corbett speaks to reporters at One Government Place in this file photo from January. Corbett responded to the federal budget at a press conference on Thursday night. — Ryan Taplin/Metro Halifax photo

Deputy Premier Frank Corbett speaks to reporters at One Government Place in this file photo from January. Corbett responded to the federal budget at a press conference on Thursday night. — Ryan Taplin/Metro Halifax photo

Despite millions allocated federally for ferry projects, Corbett said there would be no change to the decision to stop subsidizing the CAT ferry between Yarmouth and Maine. He hinted Harper’s decision not to raise taxes could impact the NDP’s choice of whether to hike the HST by two percentage points.

Elsewhere across the province, reaction to the budget was mixed. The Halifax Chamber of Commerce endorsed the plan for its attempts to slow spending growth. They were also happy to see $600 million go to fostering growth and innovation.

The Canadian Union of Public Employees condemned the budget for continuing to lean on the Building Canada Fund. CUPE has frequently attacked that fund because it requires governments to enter into public-private partnerships to qualify for funding. CUPE says it results in a loss of control over public assets.

Editor’s Note:
For federal budget reaction from key industry players, check out today’s special edition of NewsMakers.

Tags:, , , , , ,

Comments:

Peter Nelson

I wonder if the budget will effect the long term prospects for infrastructure spending local governments have often suffered from such funding where the oppertunity to grab these funds out weighs planning for them. In other words The economic development oppertunity out weights the establishment of need and sustainability for the future creating mini white elephants that dry up local capital and operating reserves for years to come leaving elivated local taxes and poor services especially in infrastructure like streets roads that make sence and can acutally encourage economic growth. If the feds find a way to politically pull out of a pooly planned for event especially because of inflating cost over runs. Where are these small communities then having spent time energy and monies chasing the illusion created by the promises.
…just a taxpayers thoughts.

Mar 7/2010

Leave a Reply

Weblocal.ca

Are you searching for a product, a service or a local company.