• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (3)
  •  

NS: Pacific West digs in heels over power rates

Published on July 17, 2012
Published on July 17, 2012
Ryan Van Horne  RSS Feed
Nova Scotia

Latest News

See All Articles

Regional News

See All Articles

The Cape Breton Post

A crucial electricity rate application that could save the idled NewPage mill in Port Hawkesbury could be jeopardized by Pacific West Commercial Corp.’s unwillingness to pay the higher rates associated with renewable electricity.

Topics :
Pacific West Commercial , Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board , Pacific West and Nova Scotia Power , Port Hawkesbury , Nova Scotia , Cape Breton

[HALIFAX, NS] — A crucial electricity rate application that could save the idled NewPage mill in Port Hawkesbury could be jeopardized by Pacific West Commercial Corp.’s unwillingness to pay the higher rates associated with renewable electricity.

Nova Scotia’s renewable energy standard will require that by 2015, 25 per cent of the province’s electricity must come from renewable sources.

Pacific West asked the province to make an exception for the mill, saying it was crucial for it to be viable.

When asked by Peter Gurnham, chairman of the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board, during a hearing Monday what the government’s response was, Pacific West president Ronald Stern said: “They read it and considered it, but they weren’t prepared to undertake any change in regulation.”

Gurnham pointed out to Stern that if the application from Pacific West and Nova Scotia Power Inc. for a load retention tariff does not factor in recovery of renewable energy standard costs, there’s a risk the new owners won’t be able to cover incremental power costs.

"Would you agree with me that a government that wants this transaction to happen should seriously consider taking away this risk?" said Gurnham. “If it doesn’t meet that test, then we can’t approve it.”

After a long pause in which he gathered his thoughts, Stern said Pacific West hopes to make a case that there’s already enough renewables in the system, or will be, and that an exception is reasonable, thus saving Pacific West an estimated $12.5 million annually off its power bill.

In his opening remarks, Stern says his company needs a quick and favourable power rate decision in order to proceed with the purchase of the idled NewPage mill in Port Hawkesbury.

“Unless the mill is operating and delivering paper in late September, we will jeopardize the receipt of major paper orders for 2013,” Stern said. “In order to achieve this, it is necessary for us to be in a position to close the acquisition of the mill by the middle of August.”

Stern, who is also president of Stern Partners which won the bidding for the mill, also said there is no wiggle room left.

“We moved a great deal from what our original objectives were,” Stern said. “We have reached the point in our negotiations that we’ve gone as far as we believe we can prudently go to.”

Consumer advocate Bill Mahody, who says there is a “greater than reasonable risk that ratepayers will be subsidizing the mill” asked Stern if costs went up in two years, would Pacific West be prepared to open up the deal?

"We require certainty,” Stern said, adding that there is a clause in the deal that allows for adjustments after five years.

Nelson Blackburn, the provincially-appointed small business advocate, is concerned the deal could be bad for ratepayers.

“It is the position of the (advocate) that if there are any risk consequences, as a result of the arrangement proposed, it not be borne by the ratepayers … but must be borne by the applicants,” Blackburn told the hearing.

Stern said “it is simply imperative that the Port Hawkesbury mill substantively reduce its input costs and electricity is the mill’s biggest cost.”

There are other essential concessions that Pacific West wants before it will re-start the mill. They’ve managed to get a new collective agreement with the union and are close to reaching a new forest and fibre arrangements. They have also asked for a tax break from the Canada Revenue Agency.

Comments

  • Username
    Steve from Amherst
    - July 18, 2012 at 10:02:21

    Does anyone remember Sydney Steel? Enough said IMHO

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    peter
    - July 17, 2012 at 22:21:48

    Right on Dave D. Time to show them the door, or not open the door in the first place. Our power rates will be going up enough as it is. Cannot afford to pay their share to.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Dave D
    - July 17, 2012 at 10:59:09

    It's give ,give and give to these big companies, they got the mill for a bargain price, concessions from all workers, did not even make agesture to compensate the 1000's of companies stung by the closure and now want more concessions, we would be better off to just give pensions to all the potential workers at the plant and write it off and get on with life, these guys are just like all the others trying to suck tax payers money to support a dead industry and still make a profit for their shareholders. It's time for NO MEANS NO!!!!!!!!

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising